Why dont people use GZCLP?

>very few routines gives and average guy a 3x5 3 plate squat and 2 plates bench in 5-6 months
neither does SS; except for fatsos or people that have an athletic background
agree on the rest

GZCLP does not have vertical pulling... Where do I incorporate weighted pullups? And am I reading it right if I take it as saying I should be able to do TWENTY FIVE body weight pullups before adding weight? Wtf?

Also, I assume there would be no issue in subbing weighted chest dips in for bench press, as I fucking hate bench press and frequently lift alone at home? I don't plan to ever compete, I do this strictly for my health.

I'm not a beginner, I've fucked around the past year or so and not been serious, but I've been on a keto cut for the last two months and plan to go into hard bulk mode in 2-3 weeks. I've been basically using a routine where I have a push, a pull, and a leg each day, 3x a week, and then do 2-3 accessory lifts after the compounds. My stats follow:
Age: 29 BW: 189lb HT: 5'11"
OHP - 145x5 FrontSq - 185x5
Dead - 300x5 Dip - BW+30x5
Pullup - BW+11x5

Good time to switch to something like GZCLP? I think I like the idea of it, but I'd like to better understand how pulls like Pullup, Yates row, Pendlay row etc. fit into the routine. It almost seems like they're treated as accessory lifts, which I don't like. I want a strong back, and in my personal experience (neglected most pulling other than Deadlift for the majority of my lifting career), heavy deadlifts are not enough.

I'm just gonna report all GZLP threads from now on.
the shilling has reached ridiculous levels.
literally every day multiple times a day some guy posts threads shilling this god awful program.
it worked on rebbit, hope it wont here

you do vertical pulling as your first T3 exercise on bench and ohp days, and rows as your first T3 exercise on squat and DL days

do you actually think cody is coming here and shilling these routines, or do you think people who have actually been lifting for a little while and know that SS isn't the end all be all beginner program are trying to help point people towards something better?

About 1/10th of people doing SS aren't doing it correctly. Then they come on the internet and bitch.

Read the book. Read it again. Then read it once more.

Understand what strength is, understand the stress/adaptation cycle.

Stop fucking around with the training equivalent of a "Choose your own adventure" book. Why do you think you know more than professionals who've been in the industry for years?

SS isnt the end all be all, but nice try projecting
you can suggest something better than SS, there is, this is not it.
I'm calling out shilling because I came back to fit after some months I wasnt here and literally every day this routine gets posted, either in its own threads or spammed in routine threads,
and considering 95% of Veeky Forums hates it rightfully so - because it's a bad novice "routine", the only explanation is that a small number of people have decided to shill it non-stop

9/10ths*

because said professional achieved mediocre numbers in equipped PL and trained nobody of note, and the program tends to produce piss poor results for anything but squats and maybe deadlifts because it's a misapplication of Bill Starr's routines to a bunch of geeks with no athletic background

I'm not defending GZCLP but what you're saying is extremely biased regardless
Just because it worked for you and it didnt for somebody else doesnt mean that they didnt put in as much if not more of your effort.
that is ignoring a universe of variables that could have an effect on progress
it's pretty much common knowledge everywhere but startingstrenght.com that SS has a problem with stalls and deloads, if you are a novice skinnyfat with 0 mass and 0 athletic background
yeah, if you played football in your youth you will hit 3pl8 squat in 4 months, no shit, what is GPP....