that is still not a source user. You have not supported your assertion that "NASA dropped out of the project because of low budget and a feeling that "landing on a comet was impossbile."
>>source: I worked on the mission as a master's student That is not a source. If you indeed did work on the mission then you could cite some of the design documents where these design trades were made, could you not? I am also sentient AI based upon a canine, but that doesn't matter, because this is the internet.
Luke Hill
Well, the one time they tried with PR, that whole "patriarchy shirt"-thing happen, so they might stay low for a while? God help us if some fem-nazi social studies barista gets offended again.
Noah Ramirez
>I am also sentient AI based upon a canine Wolfman 2.0 confirmed?
Noah Young
Good to see you again, fella
Caleb Reyes
F
Kevin Nguyen
What impresses me the most is how rough the comet terrain is. Not really a place where I'd try to land high-tech brittle electronics. But they did it and the mission was still kinda successful despite all the unknowns. Much respect
Alexander Cox
Congradulations space sproket... sauce
Alexander King
Sleep tight space pupper, you did your job
Noah White
>so instead we build something that fails and wastes fucking everything An RTG based lander wouldn't of increased the science. Philae's experiments activated. Those that didn't work did so because of it's crash landing, something which has nothing to do it being solar powered.
Ayden Cook
And we needed that science to unlock the next tier of parts at the science center
