In and of itself

>I

>the aforementioned
>the latter
>the former

Fuck off all of you, pleb tryhards. The only reason you're mocking these literary microcliches, is because they're entirely common and semantically reasonable. There is literally nothing wrong with either of these examples you dolts are posting. Youre doing nothing but quoting miniscule parts of a text that are too insignificant to affect any literary merit or quality in any way. Some of you aren't just shitposting and trolling, you actually think you've criticised something. Gits.

>a priori
>a posteriori

>insofar as

What should I use instead?

A buncha

>perchance

> ">"

hella