Why do people get so triggered when you say that "race is a social construct"?

Maybe because you're making a false claim, faggot. If you're unconvinced at this point that there are different races, let me offer you an example which may remedy this belief instilled in you by your shitty liberal university:

There are several types of apples.

Take red apples and green apples for example:

Red apples are of the color red (by definition) and green apples are of the color green (also by definition). Most red apples taste sweet, and most green apples taste sour. So stop spreading this lie that there are no races

because you sound like you have a extrem lack of intelligentsia.

taco/10 made me reply

because a lot people dont know what race means.

Poe's law tier

Here's an excellent analogy.

All races are mixed. However, racists think that certain races are "purer" because they were in existence earlier.

Europeans are a mixture of different races that mixed up 15,000 years ago, and then again 5,000 years ago.

Mexicans are a mixture of European and Native. However, because European is already mixed, that somehow makes Mexicans "more mixed".

If we use this same logic, then future generations are always more "degenerate" than past ones. Mom and dad mix genetic material to create kids. Those kids then mix with other kids to create grandkids.

The grandkid would be more "mixed" than the grandparents.

no one disagrees with that

it doesn't mean they aren't a different breed

brainlet tier

>Haplogroups just describe ancestral descent.

It is true that it describes ancestral descent but this is through identifing specific genes found within a given region.

>If a black man fucks a bunch of white women and a bunch of Asian women, the progeny will all have the haplogroup of the black man.

The progeny would receive haplotypes from both the black man and the white/ asian women. The progeny however would not necessarily find itself in the exact same haplogroup as the black by default.

The issue here lies in the black person (to a lesser extent the white and asian too). First we have to identify what region the said black man is native to. If they're from sub-sahara Africa than yes, the progreny will likely fall closer to his haplogroup. But if they're from America then the progreny may fall closer to the white woman's haplogroup due to the chance of the black man having a relatively high admixture of white (European genes) in him.

DELET THIS

>racists think that certain races are "purer" because they were in existence earlier.
How is it racist to think that? A black person whose ancestors bred among themselves for 15000 years up until now is a purer black than a black whose parents bred among themselves for 9000 up until now you fucking retard

>"racist"
take your shitty liberal rhetoric and shove it up your ass

That picture is retarded and proves nothing.

Humans have an Fst of about 0.15 overall, while almost all other apes are around 0.3-0.4. All other apes have about ten times as much genetic diversity as humans. All humans alive today are more genetically related to each other than two different troops of chimps are.