Why do people get so triggered when you say that "race is a social construct"?

>genes found within a given region.

Learn the difference between gene and allele. All humans have the same genes.

Right, but none of that is actually relevant to race. In the past, "races" or "tribes" constantly mixed.

For example:

30,000 years ago, European hunter with haplogroup I fucks girl, has a son. The progeny continue having sons until today, and today's male child has haplogroup I, and is 99.99% European genetically.

Random Japanese person sails to Europe 30,000 years ago, fucks girl, has a son. Same thing happens, today's son has haplogroup D (typical of Japanese), and is 99.99% European genetically.

Haplogroups are based on SNPs in y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA anyway.

They have zero relevance to genetic diversity or heridability anyway. Racists just latch on to the idea because to them it makes it appear that humans are different from one another, but they don't even understand what haplogroups are.

>Europeans" and "Japanese" are very discrete from each other.

Not genetically.

I don't know why this is such a hard lesson for racists.

It's kind of like some weird Freudian fixation. Maybe they have penis envy.

I know. I posted the map because it's relevant to what I said.

Human "races" are much closer to each other than "races" of other animals, what you said is true.

But EVEN if an alt-righter wants to discriminate based on that small difference, there still isn't a one-to-one correlation between "appearance" and the "genetic race".

So by shunning an Arab, and accepting a blue eyed Kalash, you'd actually be rejecting your own genetic kin. Because race is a social construct, and the Kalash are a more different race, that just happens to also have gone through high selection for light pigmentation.

Yes, they are. Biometrics companies can differentiate European genomes from Japanese ones with 100% accuracy.

Europeans and Syrians/Tunisians? Less so, because there's more admixture there.

Differentiation is not the same as saying two things are significantly different or that they are discrete things.

Remember that there is more genetic variation found within any divided population of humans than between them. If you were to pick a random European and a random Japanese, they are more likely to be genetically similar to one another than anyone in their group.

>are different races, because each of these races has a certain set of physical and intellectual qualities that are unique to it.
Not true. There are traits that are more common in some races that aren't common in other races, but all traits are encountered in every race.

source?