SHUT YOUR FUCKING HOLE BROSCIENCE FAG YOUR A FUCKING BRAINLET PIECE OF SHIT KYS HARD BITCH
The most abundant source of free energy
Brody Parker
Asher Jackson
>muh Trump
Meanwhile, in reality - Trump's working with Congress to push through legislation that would dramatically increase investment in new nuclear plants, which will do far more for American alternative energy infrastructure than the Democrats accomplished in the last eight years with all their taxes, regulations, and 'carbon credits'.
Andrew Flores
Lets see proof that im wrong instead of
>IM SO BUTTBLASTED REDDIT GTFO
Without any proof that constrasts my statement youre viewpoint is no more accurate than mine.
Benjamin White
Kek. You are like some futuristic climate science denier.
> I'm conservative and, as long as I am making money, there are no consequences to anything that I do!
Gavin Bennett
>bringing up politics here
>pushing something off for a few hundred years is the same thing as pushing something off for literally hundreds of millions of years
If we ever got to that point, we would've generated enough energy to easily get to and harness other planets energy.
Wyatt Cox
You must be scientifically illiterate if you think adding a few seconds on to the day in exchange for free energy would be a bad deal. I mean that's really an embarrassing thing to believe.
William Gray
Still no proof to the contrary.
>the burden of proof lies with those making a claim
We are both making a claim. Mine seems more logical and sensible than the one coming from the guy claiming "free energy hurr durr".
Dylan Moore
>the burden of proof lies with those making a claim
Fallacy. It's extremely simple math to estimate the energy we would have to harness to add a single second to the length of a day, and frankly the amount is so inconceivably small that it's a needless chore to do the math yourself. This guy already did it anyway:
>mb-soft.com
>I would point out here that this amount of "spinning energy" of the Earth is around 60 thousand million times that TOTAL ELECTRIC USAGE of all Americans for an entire year! And at least a billion times ALL the energy that has EVER been created and used by humans!
We would add significantly less time to the day per year than is already naturally added by the moon. It's simply a non-factor.
Aiden Cook
it ends up being very big for the amount of power produced:
rilhas.com
and solar power ends up being cheaper
Luke Hernandez
Wouldn't the cabling be an issue?
Rather un-hospitable up that way. Construction and housing would be brutal. Then there's all the maintenance, either in the sun all the time or not at all.
And I don't see what you could build to tap that rotation. And slowing down the earth might not matter at first: until it went exponential. Problem with exponential curves is that they will NOT stabilize. Exponential curves continue to exponentiate between "subjective" measurements and predictions. This is why scientists are continually "stunned" by recent weather events and records (3 straight hottest years on record is a visible presentation of an exponentiating exponential increase in the frequency, duration and intensity of catastrophic weather events).
What should be shocking and surprising: that it isn't worse already (though wwiii would certainly do some serious damage to the environment and weather).