I am the product of an algorithm for making self replicating molecules. This is a fact I cannot escape, ever...

>The Anthropic Principle implies MWI, which also implies a higher intelligence at some point in the universe's history. There's your "in".
The Anthropic Principle may give a fair indication of life, but not intelligence. Intelligence isn't the goal of evolution, just a possible outcome of it.

Evolution doesn't have a "goal".

Goal as a word is very strongly just a human illusion.

For example, did you know that each of your cells works independently? None of your cells is trying to keep you alive, every cell is just trying to keep themselves alive. Cells do communicate though, but not in a human way. It's more like sneaking in spies that will alter their behavior.

Another example is human. Humans don't really have a goal. Goals are just written letters on paper. Human basically thinks just few seconds ahead of himself. All kinds of "plans" are just illusions and not really any boundaries.

Veryinterresssting, First off, Darwin is a bit overrated imo. Secondly, the evolution theory is still a 'theory' If it were 100% correct it would be called the law of evolution. Do not get me wrong I do think its probably the most plausible theory, however it does not explain Homo'sapiens just because the timescale is waaay to short. First organisms originated 300-500 million years ago. This is waaay to short in evolution theories own conclusion to create such a complex life forms as humans. Something sped up the process----or the earth is not 4 but at least 14 billionish years old. Also offcourse there is still ''the missing link'' that oughto give us proof of our former state Homo'erectus or something baka,,which is still missing.

Maybe I'm retarded, but the thought of this is not something that has ever bothered me.

>reproduction isn't a goal
We all know there's no intent, but the language of intent is still useful, retard.

Reproduction isn't a goal.
Go ask an embryo what it's goal is; survival and growth, not reproduction.
Go ask a child what his goal is; having fun and avoiding pain, not reproduction.
Go ask brainwashed cuck citizen of the Nation what his goal is; reproduction and taxes.
Go ask injured, hungry human what his goal is; getting food and through injuries; not reproduction.

Some things at certain context seems to reproduce. That's all you can say comfortably. Just because most animals reproduce doesn't mean there's anything fundamental in it.

Is this autism? How do I respond to this, Veeky Forums?

DNA\Genetic purpose=survive
Survival=procreation
BAKA

What about fungi individuals that grow but never reproduce? What about quorum and biofilms? How about swarms? How about altruism and shared genes? What about immortal creatures that shift back to earlier phase of lifecycle? What about "phoenix", the process of killing yourself so others like you will raise from your corpse? What about bacteria's doing hibernation, aka being 'dead' until a certain condition happens? What about viruses?

Have you really studied any biology or are you just talking about philosophy of life?

You're a faggot