Bassically when wikileaks released Vault 7,
included in the conversations between CIA
employees were memes. A fuck ton of them.
every documented meme (that I know of) can be found:
ciamemes.neocities.org
Prove me wrong
Josiah Bailey
Angel Edwards
Nope, if the marbles used each have a weight of 1000 kg, 1 missing would make difference big enough.
Parker Jackson
yeah ding dong but there's only 50k marbles in your theoretical example. If we're talking about a relationship between .999... and 1, it would be more like ∞ marbles and you take away one.
Brandon Russell
give me an algebreic proof faggot. words let you make shit up.
Samuel Anderson
an infinitesimal 1 is still an infinitesimal 1.
It doesn't change the fact that it's not completely
zero.
Wyatt King
9/9=0.9999
10/9=1/9+9/9=0.1111+0.9999
by the logic you are using
9/9 is not even 1.
Jackson Wilson
>10/9=1
no, retard, 10/9 = 1.1111...
try not being retarded
Luis Long
I did. And you can't have it.
Ian Sanchez
0.9 = 9/10
(9(10^(-a-1) - 1)) / (10(10^(-1) - 1)) // 10^1 * 10^(-1) = 10^0 = 1
= (-9(10^(-a-1) - 1)) / (9) // (9)s cancel out
= -(10^(-a-1) - 1)
= 1 - 10^(-a-1)
Lim a->infinity, substitute infinity to get the value
= 1 - 10^(-i-1)
= 1 - 10^(-i) // negative infinity subtract a number is negative infinity
= 1 - (10 / i)
= 1 - (1 / i)
Can we agree that
Lim a->infinity = 1 - (1 / i)
All I did was simplify the equation by elimination, so there's nothing changed.
Assume,
0.9r = 1
(I write 0.9 repeated as 0.9r)
The use of geometric progression is the only way to write 0.9r.
Therefore
1 - (1 / i) = .9r
Agree? Ok.
.9r = 1
.9r = 1 - (1 / i)
1 - (1 / i) = 1
1 / i = 0
FALSE. Division by infinity DOES NOT EQUAL ZERO. It's an infintesimally small number, NOT ZERO.
THEREFORE 0.9r CANNOT EQUAL 1