Human body design flaws

No

yea, that's an anomaly though, it's not fair cause you can add like shit where you can piss through your navel

a real design flaw is like you cartilage not having blood vessels ergo no regeneration with no real reason behind it

Check out the recurrent laryngeal nerve, it starts from the larynx (voice box) and goes down all the way to the aortic arch in the thorax, goes under it and then back up to the brain. A remnant from times where necks weren't really a thing yet. Looks especially hilarious in giraffes.

Whoa, very much an "intelligent design". ;)

I've come across this before listening to a debate on religion and it was used to strengthen the religious party's argument.
Fascinating how people explain biology of animals without Evolution.

>What did god mean
It's meant to test your Faith.

Don't get me wrong, God or gods may, or may not exist.

However, I don't approve of "intelligent design" as there are clear indictators of a common ancestry (outside of being created by the same being(s)).

Not to mention, often when creation myths are told or written they are normally vague and when not vague those oral traditions or written traditions have existed for hundreds, if not tens of thousands of years and would, even if they once were the word of their God or gods, be almost entirely replaced by human fabrication.

So whilst disproving "intelligent design" is possible, it doesn't disprove a God or gods, be they Christian or Hindu (who very well might be same gods acting as a single God, or vice versa).

>I've come across this before listening to a debate on religion and it was used to strengthen the religious party's argument
What the fuck, how would you do that?

Yeah sure, but what has that to do with this thread? I thought it was about making fun of intelligent design.

I couldn't care less about you being religious. But evolution is at least mostly true and intelligent design is a joke. God could have started off evolution because he would have known that humans would get created in the process since he's omniscient and all of that bullshit. Accepting the evidence for evolution doesn't make you automatically an atheist, unless your belief is directly linked to believing the bible is literally true and filled with factual descriptions of reality. Not sure why you think this is an attack against all forms of religion.

I pretty much said what you said, I think you misunderstood the premise?

No I don't understand why you brought it up in the first place. I agreed with your off-topic afterthought.

Ah, eitherway, I consider myself agnostic until I am presented with unassailable proof.

Only when tards like you make threads.

>What the fuck, how would you do that?
My guess is that they saw it as an argument against intelligent design so many times that they had to come up with something to say about it, rather than having to react to it defensively

Human bodies are weak as fuck. Literally the only thing that separates up from other "apex" predators is our intelligence and our dexterity. But it turns out that these two things (being orders of magnitude greater than anything else) are such massive advantages that we have grown to have no real competitors on earth besides each other.

Yeah but what was their argument?

>the human body is capable of producing weapons that can end all life on earth

god may have went too far in a few places

doesn't really matter since there is no god

there is this joke about a bunch of different kind of engineers having a drink together and talking about god. they each say how god is the same kind of engineer they are, because of something about the human body.

The punchline is when the civil engineer says "well god isn't a civil engineering. who would put the recreational facilities next to the waste treatment facilities?"

Darn you beat me to it. Just to add more, the bad Laryngeal nerve route goes all the back to FISH.

Maybe I am dumb, but what is this trying to show?

I'm not 100% sure but I guess one of the two balls did not descend correctly

Plural form of Plexus is Plexūs, NOT "plexi".
Also, how the fuck is the Plexus coeliacus easy accessible? Do you even macroscopic anatomy, bruh?

Yeah, but the picture is wrong anyway:
the Vas deferens of the supposedly "correct" testicle shouldn't go into the Penis.

Buh the invisible man

>Into the trash it goes

6 and 6 are the two testicles. One of the testicles connects directly to the seminal vesicle, the other one loops around over the left ureter.

Is this the case in every man?

Yes, unless you're different.

OP seems to be suggesting it is a prevalent trait at the very least

Left brachiocephalic vein
Right brachiocephalic vein

Brachiocephalic artery

REEEEEEEEEE

>So he's going to be pendantic.
>Plural form of Plexus is Plexūs, NOT "plexi".
Actually, plexi is an acceptable plural form.
>Also, how the fuck is the Plexus coeliacus easy accessible?
A moderate punch can easily affect it, as would other forms of direct assault (that seems like poor planning, if intelligent design was really a thing).
>Do you even macroscopic anatomy, bruh?
Do you?
>of Plexus
>is Plexūs
>the Plexus
>the Vas deferens
>the Penis
These are a non-standard (erroneous) use of English written grammar, on a greater magnitude than my unsual plural.

Well, I think that's user BTFO, next time pick on someone on your lesser level.

Can you really call them "flaws" though? Flaws are contextual in nature, and the perpetuation of flaws through subsequent offspring implies they didn't have any significant disadvantage to the species as a whole. I guess humans are an exception though, because technology has allowed them to live despite some obvious genetic disadvantages.

Don't tell /pol/, but white skin color seems like a flaw in human design. Considering most animals thrive in warmer climates and therefore are exposed to more severe UV radiation, white skin color seems counterproductive.

Also, humans are also vulnerable to traumatic brain injury. I think the lack of a better safeguard is definitely a flaw.

Apart from essential organs, the neck is the most important part of the body.

- It is completely unprotected
- It has very weak muscles compared to the object it must support
- It is packed very tightly with important things, making any injury to the neck very impactful and very hard to repair through surgery

So your argument is that because something different didn't develop, what did develop was the best possibility?

No. I'm trying to argue that what has developed is the best possibility. In a competitive situation such as natural selection, a ubiquitously expressed phenotype on a species which thrives cannot be a flaw unless it confers a significant disadvantage. Using hypothetical situations where species 'X' now has protection on its neck from lacerations is pointless if this species is of least concern. So many variables shape the development of a successful organism, so interchanging phenotypes on a highly successful one isn't necessarily an improvement, it's just speculation.

>all these armchair gods thinking they could create a better human

y'all are brainlets

You burgers raelly are something special...
>acceptable plural form
Says who? Just because you burgers are too lazy to use proper Latin, it doesn't mean you're right.

Also, do you know something called Terminologia Anatomica (1998)?
The official Latin name of all the entities/objects I wrote starts with a capital letter.
Not only is my use of capitalization correct, it also makes you an ignorant burger for not knowing how thing are properly named.

>moderate punch can easily affect it [Plexus coelicaus]
No? It fucks up your Diaphragma for a couple of second and therefore your respiration.
That Plexus is ventral to the Pars abdominalis aortae, so how can a moderate punch reach it?

>BTFO
Next time pick some other ignorant burger on your side of the ocean if you want to BTFO someone.
This.

I don't know, but it'd be nice if we could fix those flaws or prevent them from being exploited by pathogens.

God made us perfect not ideal so it's not blasphemy to ponder "better" configurations of the human body.

human bodies can be surprisingly strong and resilient if they get used everyday.

you literally can't look at a human body from after agriculture began and use that for your argument that humans suck physically.

Where else would you put it?