Human body design flaws

No

yea, that's an anomaly though, it's not fair cause you can add like shit where you can piss through your navel

a real design flaw is like you cartilage not having blood vessels ergo no regeneration with no real reason behind it

Check out the recurrent laryngeal nerve, it starts from the larynx (voice box) and goes down all the way to the aortic arch in the thorax, goes under it and then back up to the brain. A remnant from times where necks weren't really a thing yet. Looks especially hilarious in giraffes.

Whoa, very much an "intelligent design". ;)

I've come across this before listening to a debate on religion and it was used to strengthen the religious party's argument.
Fascinating how people explain biology of animals without Evolution.

>What did god mean
It's meant to test your Faith.

Don't get me wrong, God or gods may, or may not exist.

However, I don't approve of "intelligent design" as there are clear indictators of a common ancestry (outside of being created by the same being(s)).

Not to mention, often when creation myths are told or written they are normally vague and when not vague those oral traditions or written traditions have existed for hundreds, if not tens of thousands of years and would, even if they once were the word of their God or gods, be almost entirely replaced by human fabrication.

So whilst disproving "intelligent design" is possible, it doesn't disprove a God or gods, be they Christian or Hindu (who very well might be same gods acting as a single God, or vice versa).

>I've come across this before listening to a debate on religion and it was used to strengthen the religious party's argument
What the fuck, how would you do that?

Yeah sure, but what has that to do with this thread? I thought it was about making fun of intelligent design.

I couldn't care less about you being religious. But evolution is at least mostly true and intelligent design is a joke. God could have started off evolution because he would have known that humans would get created in the process since he's omniscient and all of that bullshit. Accepting the evidence for evolution doesn't make you automatically an atheist, unless your belief is directly linked to believing the bible is literally true and filled with factual descriptions of reality. Not sure why you think this is an attack against all forms of religion.

I pretty much said what you said, I think you misunderstood the premise?