>Modern germs lose their resistance to older drugs that have not been used for generations.
>Bacteria randomly loses DNA for no reason.
I think what you mean is that we use older antibiotics for more recent resistant bacteria, but once they've developed immunity, they don't lose it unless they are wiped out completely.
Study source?
>Bacteria randomly loses DNA for no reason.
Yeah, actually. Species lose genes they don't use all the time. It costs energy and time to keep copying a gene so strains of the bacteria without the gene will be at a selective advantage in a scenario where the antibiotic is not being used. This is evolution 101.
Fucking imbecile. Are you an undergrad or something? You sound stupid.
Fucking imbecile.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The biggest problem is that these will again be obsolete soon. We need a large enough rotation and proper monitoring of rotation then we'd be able to merely cycle through those over decades to stay ahead of the game. Sadly, I don't think the medical community has their shit together on that level.
TBF user, if you don't recover from strep throat in 7 or so days and develop kidney inflammation or rheumatic fever.
Rheumatic fever can very easily be fatal if it leads to heart valve complications.
Source:
Junior Dr.
>Every decade or so.
>evolution 101
shut up lel
>WhyDoMenStillHaveNipples.jpg
my fucking sides.
Brainlet damage control.
You're both fucking retarded.
Cells can never "Lose" DNA, they can mutate when reproducing and that gene may not be carried on, but them it basically becomes another organism.
It would also have to be stronger than the previous organism to be viable for mitosis.
I don't think it's ever actually ever been observed though.
Did you save a lot of energy during development to revert back to your natural ape-like state?