Mini verses

your right but wasn't Einstein called a autistic for coming up with his theories, i know what your going (maybe) to maybe say that he studied science while you would say that im making actual retardation posts

well, you're not wrong about Einstein,

>well, you're not wrong about Einstein.
yay something im not wrong about hahahaha

fuck you man, all I'm saying is
in simpler terms is it's not
possible ( right now because of our current technology limitation) unlike on rick and morty's
their technology and storyline is far more advanced and some quite logically impossible

but I'm not saying we can't, it's just were limited to even think about making it.

>fuck you man
sorry, wasnt meaning to anger you my dude.

>in simpler terms is it's not possible ( right now because of our current technology limitation) unlike on rick and morty's their technology and storyline is far more advanced and some quite logically impossible but I'm not saying we can't, it's just were limited to even think about making it.

i wasnt talking anything about the shows tech i was using what i knew to theorize if it could happen (from what i know), i was watching Brian Cox lecture on the universe and near the end of it. it had me thinking about it.

Quarks...
You mean Quazars? Black holes can and do die when they have eaten everything in sight and the distance is too far for them to continue consuming...
They reach stasis and sometimes they go boom.

Boom is not a big bang though... Those particals are at a lower energy than before...

Everything you see around you that is alive is burning....
Burning away to nothing...

However....On the plus side when the big bang reaches stasis it will collapse into itself to recycle everything anew....

If you are truly in persuit of the "miniverse" you must first simulate THIS universe or similar using information and numbers gathered from observatories and sciences....

Once you have encapsulated the knowledge of the universe into a simulation you can do anything with that information...

It all starts with knowing how to make a seed....
Then a root...
Then a stem...
Then a tree...
If you apply geometry to science there are infinite ways to play the game...

However to fully understand life
you must understand death and decay...

Beware though...this is the true knowledge which birthed the nuclear bomb....are you really willing to sacrifice it all to attain an understanding even if it leaves you bereft of will? Like a fucking ghost?....Everything has a price...I would research immortallity before undertaking something like this...

>Quazars
YES! holy shit thank you!

>However....On the plus side when the big bang reaches stasis it will collapse into itself to recycle everything anew....
hang on if
>Everything you see around you that is alive is burning.... Burning away to nothing
what if it would be that its doing (the above implied) just just so really fast but in its verse is like our time?

the problem is i dont have any mean of using these observatories and have not learnt (or currently doing a PHD or masters) in science. but if i could i would try really hard and even create implied particles/radiation/something that could maybe prove that it could or might be. hell if someone predicted the biggs particle, others could do the same (although the guy did do the maths and sciences to have an accurate prediction.

the closest thing to immortality would be the computerization of a person, that or something based of some jellyfish DNA that could be gene spliced into a experimental lab rat or something. to further go on with the computerization, Ghost in the shells implantation of the human brain into a robot/cyborg could happen in the next few (or 5) decades.

on the topic of the research though are you implying that it would lead to another weapon of mass destruction????