Red pill me on Marie Curie

Nobody have said anything about her nationality, and what her being pollack have to do with whether feminists can be proud about her or not?
jebany wykopku
jeszcze zbóldup o polskie obozy koncentracyjne smieciu

But it's the same like with dogs or monkeys who can draw or count, there was one specimen able to do that but the rest of them can't. Not the best argument to advance the feminist cause

Women kangz.

There have been next to no women of merit throughout history, let alone science. So in an effort to legitimize their world view, some people emphasize (and/or lie about/twist) the achievements of women.

There is a reason why you rarely hear about the women who made legitimate/notable contributions. It's because they are contributions of minor impact.
Meme figures rule the science landscape. The memes (mostly) made legitimate contributions, but the importance of the contributions are massively ballooned.

Basically, you expect the contributions of meme figures to be over-emphasized, but the level of over-emphasis of meme woman, combined with there being just one makes it overt.

I'd like for there to be more praise of non-meme figures who made more important/notable contributions other that tesla. I want there to be praise of gauss, pasteur, haber, bessemer, czochralski, kroll, etc.

The only non-meme women I know are pitiful, like labtech woman who 'discovered' kevlar, 'mother of computer science' (complete bullshit) who made a math algorithm and suggested that an existing algorithm could be used for a practical purpose, and woman paleontologist who didn't have a degree but made legitimate contributions.

The amateur paleotologist is the most legitimate out of all of those... Women have done nothing of note for science.

.
>>>tl;dr
>with what purpose?
Some people feel the need to mesh reality and their world view at the cost of reality in order to maintain their delusions.

>Men have contributed the most to science, so it's impossible that a single woman could have contributed anything to science

Pretty ignorant desu

There'd also be an increase in scientific contributions by women in the past centuries if women would have been treated less like the generic housewife etc

Bell *clap* curve.

Women are genetically predisposed to mediocrity.

Okay so you've explained a hypothetical why, but still no what. How exactly are what she has accomplished not legit?

I'm not trying claim it wasn't legitimate, just that the importance of the contribution is overstated.
You don't hear about the curieS or the other lad that won the prize with them.

>The only non-meme women I know are pitiful
That's kinda on you being ignorant of people like Emmy Noether and Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin

Evidence?

She was French. Get over it polacks

Pierre Curie and Marie Curie both earned a nobel prize for their ground breaking work on the subject of radioactivity. How is that overstated?

They're always mentioned together, the reason you only remember Marie Curie is because it's rare for a woman to earn a nobel prize of, not for men. That's probably why Pierre Curie didn't stick with you.

They're /always/ mentioned together