Time to end the debate

Tau is shear stress, mathtards

You mean u for uler's constant, right?

[math]\Phi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx1.62[/math]

it seeds all, especially 's ass

pretty much this and if anything [math]2\pi[/math] looks better and is easier to type than [math]\frac{\tau}{2}[/math] especially when it comes to superscripts

I believe in the superiority of τ but write it as 2π.

ideally we would all use tau but pi is the meme. if you introduced tau in a report you would be required to tell the reader what it was. pi is ubiquitous.

tau is literally only better w/r/t the unit circle, but plebs don't realize that when describing a circle as a function, two functions must be used: one for the top half, and one for the bottom, and thus, since pi describes the semicircle in radians, it is better for use when representing the true patrician double-semi-circle

what if a circle with circumference tau is not so fundamental as a circle missing two diametrically opposed points which would then have two fundamental unit of length pi instead of one of length tau? Also, what about transformations like

[math] \hat 2:\,\pi\to\tau[/math]

that turn each disconnected arc between the two null points into its own new circle with or without extra null points.

Has there been any research done on the partitioning of R by the equivalence relation defined as follows:
x ~ y iff a*x = y for some a in Q
With this sort of structure, transcendentals like pi and tau are considered equivalent.