Is a race just an extended family?

This is the first damn comment. Truth, bitch.

>bix nooding intensifies

Your accusation was that race is equivalent to subspecies, and then you went onto say breeds are inclined to different levels of violence. That latter statement is also a worthy conversation, but that has nothing to do with the start of the argument. As for the latter conversation, what was it about the European continent that lead Europeans to be less violent or more intelligent genetically?

It's not surprising that the dogs trained for fighting and guarding are going to be more aggressive.

The study he mentions is behind a paywall, but they have a snippet:
>No relationships between breed-characteristic behaviour and function in the breeds’ origins were found. Instead, there were correlations between breed scores and current use of the breeding stocks, which suggest that selection in the recent past has affected breed-typical behaviour.

Who know? Could be climate, founder effect, the selective effects of early European civilization, some combination of these, or something else entirely.

if you care enough to actually read it, sci-hub gets through paywalls for free

Race isn't science. Go back to pol and his.

Okay, what's the proof that is genetic and not societal?

>Veeky Forums
man, I've never been there was it infested by /pol/?

>just running your small prey down
Vs
>devising traps and tactics to hunt larger animals
And with better planning would come better communication.

Go away, rodent.