>What are your thoughts on this?
Twwduw scuwhi rjr uk p o h w r h j e e efqefwrge wt wrg wrwh t ryrjk rt e w e q r ht j t .
Carefully thought out withoutlanguage.
>What are your thoughts on this?
Twwduw scuwhi rjr uk p o h w r h j e e efqefwrge wt wrg wrwh t ryrjk rt e w e q r ht j t .
Carefully thought out withoutlanguage.
Neglected to add "speaking" to that.
>the human is a special kind of animal
if you think that is true in any for you are an idiot
I feel that nobody has the slightest clue as to the answer to this question and anyone who purports to know is either conning you or is in the valley of ignorance
There's evidence to suggest that they think in signs (or the sensation of signing).
They also tend to have much worse reading comprehension
no but self awareness and free will are different things. the cat doesnt have the same level of free will as humans, or a lot of biologists would argue, any.
Without a doubt, dealing with language is what lead to the emergence of our complex cognition.
But it's possible to think without language; most of my thoughts are conceptual/images. But the symbolic structure is probably the same as someone that thinks wholly in words.
mayberrylab.ucsd.edu
Page 24, Concept Attainment
Read it yo self