Or, since you're quite obviously out of your depth, let me spell it out both accurately and precisely:
There are a lot of standards. None of them are universal.
Want to feels like ripping your eyes out?
Leo Reyes
Josiah Butler
nice try user
Daniel Scott
>nice try user
Why are you trying to bait on Veeky Forums? Go to /b/ kiddo.
Jaxson Cook
(6^2)/2(3)+4
36/2(3) +4
18(3) +4
54 +4
58
Jacob Evans
It's 10 you mong.
Jonathan Barnes
its not
6^2/2 is a coefficient of 3
then add 4
If I am wrong, prove it
Julian Davis
Let me guess, your most frequented board is /pol/ and you believe in God.
Jose Turner
TI83: 58
TI36xPro: 58
TI30xIIs: 58
Casio FX-115ES: 58
Casio HR100TM: 58
HP 40gs: 58
6^2/2*3+4
36/2*3+4
18*3+4
54+4
58
Its not 10 you mong.
Evan Rivera
The number 2 is not in the paranthese you stupid fucks therefore there is no reason to do anything with it until its role as a multiplier is called upon. The answer is 10 and you're either a retard or a troll if you think otherwise.
Noah Torres
Your first sentence is correct, then you went retarded.