iq was meant to test logic and reasoning skills. not overall talent.
IQ
Wyatt Morris
Joseph Robinson
IQ tests are flawed. Psychology is isn't a real field of science; it's pseudoscience.
Xavier Moore
IQ tests are like a cognitive equivalent to a general fitness test. Exact number doesn't matter, isn't hugely informative and will vary test to test, but the range scores fall in give a pretty accurate picture of how good a brain you have.
IQ is pretty much the most robust result in psychology. Seriously how many sub-70 IQ physics PhDs do you think there are?
Only reason IQ is controversial is the politically incorrect race gap.
Noah Lee
>Your iq is 133
Dont think so
Christopher Collins
Like seth rogen?
Easton Lopez
IQ is utter bullshit.
IQ is never relevant in ANY valuable intellectual activity. Math, Science, writing, chess etc.
In math only the theorem you've proved matter. What is Grthendieck IQ? What is Magnus Carlsen IQ? No one goddamn knows
You cannot replace achievement by "potential to achievement" which hardly means anything.
Wrse, The IQ ideology, by propagating the idea that the intellectual ability is locked since early childhood like a processor's clock speed, encourage people to never actually do what would ultimately make them smarter as a by product: work their brain out and study.
Jews don't have an extra innate genetical processor, they are *studying*(this is what an intellectual is exactly: someone who study ) all the time. Studying is litterally part of your identity as a jew.
Asians are not born with extra genetical brain cells. An asian person is someone who trains all the time. (see flash anzan). Why every manga always show the same thing? Individuals who achieve self realization through insane amounts of training, regardless of the activity (fighting, playing go, cooking (!!), whatever)
youtube.com
Math sucks? No, we TRAIN here
Hudson Brooks
Levi Walker
That doesn't contradict what he said.
Colton Morris
Define G
IQ scores are nonsense
Hunter Nguyen
IQ is not utter bullshit.
It measures very accurately and very reliably how good a person is at tasks similar to the ones in the test.
This might seem like a joke but that is all it is.
The problem is not the procedure, it's the common understanding of "intelligence" being so different from the skill "intelligence" that is actually measured. It's a semantic confusion more than anything.