Name a bigger pseud

youtube.com/watch?v=PuoHZ80ZtFw
This is the main reason for being situationist today.

this
Zizek is not even smart imo

>Napoleon, who was a psychologist when he wished to be so, had noticed that the transition from tragedy to comedy is effected simply by sitting down. In the Journal inédit of Baron Gouraud - when speaking of an interview with the Queen of Prussia after the battle of Iéna - he expresses himself in the following terms : “She recieved me in tragic fashion like Chimène : Justice! Sire, Justice! Magdeburg! Thus she continued in a way most embarrassing to me. Finally, to make her change her style, I requested her to take a seat. This is the best method for cutting short a tragic scene, for as soon as you are seated it all becomes comedy.”

if newborn babies could speak, they would ask not to be fed spoonfuls of pseud

>omg all this crazy eastern european doee is make jokes about coffee and then blathers about ideology hes so stupid lol

Has done 10+ movies and written like 70 books (which I'm sure you've read all of to formulate your crituque)
>not even smart

Deleuze

Derrida

Are we noticing a pattern yet?

They all start with D.

DAWKINS

It's not that Lacan doesn't have any valuable or interesting ideas, he's just a terrible communicator. His lectures are a rambling mess and his prose is needlessly dense. Same goes for Derrida and to a lesser extent, Deleuze. Foucault said that the problem was the French approach to writing - if one does not write in a difficult style then one is regarded as stupid. (I think, more accurately, that he said something along the lines of "10% of what one writes must be mysticism".)