>normies actually think there are lab chemicals that will eat straight through your hand in seconds >The few that actually will they've never heard of
>Normie think "cancer" is one disease and not an umbrella term for hundreds of diseases with the only thing in common being metastatic cell growth and don't realize saying "cure for cancer" is as absurd as saying "cure for all viral diseases"
>ClF3 is the only brick-burning chemical we know of.
Nolan Gutierrez
>implying euthanasia isn't the cure to all cancers and diseases
Thomas Morgan
> that theres an undiscovered gay/trans/mental illness gene, and then asking "whats the evolutionary advanta-" etc
> that cancer incidence and spread is due solely to genetics + DNA damage + chance, instead of genetics + DNA damage + pre existing tissue climate
> highschool textbooks: that every cell in a single human body has the exact same DNA, when humans are technically mosaics with minor genetic differences in different portions of the body and the brain, with that non-uniformity mounting as one ages
> that biology is equal in nature and predictive power to physics, so that the same stimulus on a body will always yield a similar output
> (from Mercola --> Veeky Forums --> mainstream normans): that carbohydrates are the boogeyman, and you should drink 8 glasses of water a day
> that if somebody studies STEM, that means they are intelligent
> believing 'X is a social construct' implies 'X is a non empirical concept'
> that quantum uncertainty proves free will
> that Rick and Morty is good
Daniel Sanchez
>that math was discovered not invented
Brody Harris
>I know how to green text Damn normies amirite guize.
Bentley Perez
>>normies actually think there are lab chemicals that will eat straight through your hand in seconds >The few that actually will Wait, what? So you're making fun of normies for believing in something that you're then saying one line later is true?
Brayden Rivera
normie detected
Isaac Baker
Some concepts are non empirical and I like Rick and Morty.
Jeremiah Lewis
I get it, you're distinguishing yourself from normies because you're *below* average intelligence and can't understand how to make consistent statements about reality.
Jack Ross
Things autists say: >Rick and Morty is bad
That show isn't really about science which you autists all get tangled up in. There's a deeper meaning--partly about character development around a seemingly nihilistic, humorously blunt, eccentric, depressed, and drunk old man.
It also puts many social situations into perspective, and adequately depicts many absurd traits found in human and particularly teen culture.
Jason Lewis
>That show isn't really about science ^This, Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland clearly don't care about science at all, I don't know why everyone on Veeky Forums is under the impression Rick and Morty is the cartoon version of Big Bang Theory or something where they're trying to be a smart show with science references for wannabe nerds when the "science" they actually reference is always just lazy justification for introducing fantastical plots.
Lucas Sanchez
>that biology is equal in nature and predictive power to physics, so that the same stimulus on a body will always yield a similar output LOOK WHEN I HIT MY KNEE MY LEG STRAIGHTENS BIOLOGY CONFIRMED HARD SCIENCE
Cameron Robinson
>GMOs are somehow different from regular food in any meaningful way >Evolution means survival of the strongest/fastest/smartest >If you put a cat in a box it is both alive and dead >Theory means guess
Logan Turner
>IQ is a definite and unchangeable measure of intelligence >all our emotions, sensations and beliefs are controlled by chemicals in our brain >depression is a single illness and totally not an umbrella term for lots of different mental disturbances in different stages which exhibit the same psychological state
Jayden Wright
>emotions and thoughts having a physical root somehow makes them invalid >morality is subjective >everything is subjective
Asher Brown
>IQ is a definite and unchangeable measure of intelligence That's what IQ is supposed to be like when the tests assessing it are doing their job properly. It was only considered useful in the first place because of the premise that it would be stable over a lifetime. It's more normie to believe you're supposed to be able to change it because normies can't accept hopelessness as a real possibility.
Jace James
It's both. The "rules of the game" are invented, the >implications of those rules are discovered.
Hudson Morales
how you nigs miss teh biggest 1 of all time? that glass noticeably sags as it gets older
also normies fail to realize driving is the most dangerous thing most people do every day, and that when shit goes wrong, it will happen fast, and your survival can be completely out of your hands
Angel Gray
How is this the biggest misconception? Yes it's wrong but it's understandable, glass DOES flow, albeit far too slowly to notice after just a few hundred years, and medieval windowmakers put the thick part of the glass at the bottom consistently, giving the impression that it had flowed.
Jose Walker
It's a measure of a type of intelligence, "g" or general / problem-solving intelligence. It is in fact pretty stable, after you reach full maturity your IQ declines very slowly until death but a measurement at age 25 should be nearly the same as a measure at age 60, assuming it is an actual measure and not an online multiple choice shitshow.
Caleb Ross
It's not so much that everything IS subjective as that we are forever contained within our own subjectivity, and so cannot ever hope to determine whether or not it is the fact that everything actually is subjective.
Josiah Thomas
I put my cat in a box and he was dead/alive. Checkmate, atheists!
We donno yet >"We find that particles have to cooperate to move: if one particle can move a little ways, then one of its neighboring particles can move into the space left behind by the first particle; and then perhaps a third particle can follow the second particle, and so on. The more glass-like the sample is, the more particles cooperate at the same time. However, it takes longer and longer times before we see one of these cooperative events. Thus, it is possible that when all of the particles have to cooperate in order for any of them to move, you have a glass. Perhaps the time between cooperative rearrangements diverges, as well as the number of particles needed to cooperate, and it is the divergence of these two dyanamical quantities that distinguishes a glass from a liquid. Our data isn't inconsistent with this hypothesis -- which is a weasly scientist way of saying we have no idea if this really happens, but it's an intriguing idea that could be possible, so I mention it here on this web page. At least, the possibility is one reason why I find this interesting." physics.emory.edu/faculty/weeks//lab/glass/
I dont care if the science is accurate or not, it is just not as funny as people say it is and is complete normie tier cartoon .
Juan Moore
There is no such thing as subjectivity because an objective truth does exist. Subjectivity implies it's not possible to be wrong, but it is. It doesn't matter if "we are forever contained within our own subjectivity" because the objective reality exists and you can still be wrong. No one having the right answer doesn't mean they stop having wrong answers.
Sebastian Ross
>be maths student >"You're just like Sheldon from Big Bang Theory!" Th-Thanks mom
Jonathan Morales
Dum makiposter
Noah White
>>all our emotions, sensations and beliefs are controlled by chemicals in our brain What are they controlled by?
Jack Cook
>it's too mainstream You know being hipster is now mainstream? What you gonna do now?
Owen Mitchell
After coming in from /tv/ I feel like I should thank you for actually discussing the show rationally.
All of this sounds like conjecture you could come up with in a night on Wikipedia. Your claims are rather outlandish.
Eli Miller
>There is no such thing as subjectivity because an objective truth does exist.
>1 Prove an objective reality exists. I'll wait. >2 Even if you could prove that (and you can't), that still doesn't mean subjectivity doesn't exist. Subjective just means "from your point of view", are you telling me you don't experience anything? Are you an automaton, or a philosophical zombie?
>Subjectivity implies it's not possible to be wrong
No, it doesn't. It just means you can never know with full 100% certainty whether you are right or wrong.
Parker Brooks
God, obviously.
Blake Williams
>trying to discuss tv and film on /tv/
Top kek, you'll be telling me you tried to talk about videogames on /v/ next!
Ian Perez
>High school textbook But why? Is it just commonly misread or is it mistaught?
>STEM = intelligent You can't be this stupid
Bentley Morgan
>/tv/ talks about things other than RLM, Chris Nolan, and little girls now Damn, have I really been gone that long?
Gabriel Russell
>people who believe a blanket aspect about GMOs are silly >I assert this by making an equally silly blanket statement about GMOs neck yourself, pseud
Jackson Peterson
/tv/ is for talking about politics
Jackson Price
Sorry I suck at biology, thank you.
Christian Jackson
Jfc I was wondering what you meant and went over to /tv/
Many talk like Rick is a real person or idol, and others are stuck on the "achtwallyy" part discussed earlier
Ryan Butler
op you are one brain washed faggot.
Parker Barnes
>I don't believe in God, but I do believe in karma -Basic white bitch Actual thing said to me in real life.
Morality is subjective though
Joseph Mitchell
Well glass is a liquid, everybody kmows that
Ian Russell
watch yourself, respond to me like that again and YOU will be a liquid, namely a dispersing group of aerosolized post-human particles
John Richardson
You realize that biology is more than just anatomy and medical shit right?
Angel Sullivan
The normie perception is that common concentrated acids like sulfuric, nitric, etc. will fizz a hole through your hand on contact when really it would have to be submerged in the shit for hours. Not even HF will do that; it will quicker than the rest, but you'll be long dead before you see that if you spill that much HF on yourself.
Yes, there is stuff like flouroantimonic acid, Caro's acid, chlorosulfuric, O2F2, etc. But that stuff is rare with niche uses.
Jack Harris
>Morality is subjective though nope. it comes from god
Adrian Butler
>Exoplanets within the Goldilocks zone are rare. >Exoplanets with liquid water on the surface are rare and super unique. >Red Dwarfs are GoOD Stars.
Aaron Morgan
Literally no one thinks that
Jason Lopez
Can you guys redpill me on carbohydrates?
William Perez
How can i find out my IQ... im a poorfag in Ontario Canada.
Camden Powell
>morality is objective
Hudson Reyes
prove it yourself
Gabriel King
/tv/ is quite possibly THE most autistic biard on Veeky Forums, more so even than /v/. I'm not sire what it is about tv and film that attracts autistic retards but fuck do they love their incredibly tired memes and endless threads about garbage """programs""" like Pickle & Morty and Game of Cucks.
Hunter Nelson
If it did, it would STILL be subjective, you dope.
Jack Ward
Eh, maybe try contacting your local University psych department, see if they have any grad students looking to practice administering IQ tests. Otherwise, you'll have to pay someone.
Jason Carter
It WAS funny as all fuck but this season while not always awful has been a regrettable downturn on the whole. Pickle-rick was like an episode of superjail.
Luis Turner
Long story short: it's sugar.
Justin Stewart
So the whole "God give us free will" is bullshit...
Jace Thompson
It's the other way around, mate. Beliefs and emotions in the form of synapses control the chemicals in the brain. Adding more chemicals will only drug you up and not actually change your beliefs or something.
Jonathan Richardson
It really isn't, m8. You can easily find studies cmproving how IQ changes over time or how it changes depending on long-term conditions (childhood, socioeconomic status, etc) or short-term conditions (time of the day, emotional state).
Normie brainlet spotted.
Anthony Kelly
This. Hormones and neurotransmitters are just symbols through which our neural system represents and communicates emotions. If you pump a neurotransmitter into your system, you just interferes with this system of communication and make your neurons believe your internal state is something different from what it actually is. A simplistic analogy would be that neurons are constantly sending out "happy" or "sad" words into your bloodstream based on their internal state, and drugs just indiscriminately pump in "happy" words into your system and fuck up the communication between neurons.
Lucas Roberts
>>"You're just like Sheldon from Big Bang Theory!"
Aaron Rodriguez
more useless trolling clutter
Kayden Stewart
Life is worth living
Cameron Hill
>Uhh actually sweetheart, it's a PHYSICAL law. Action creates reaction, it was discovered by some dude with apple or something, stupid.
SEETHING
Grayson Morales
> (from Mercola --> Veeky Forums --> mainstream normans): that carbohydrates are the boogeyman, and you should drink 8 glasses of water a day
I drink 8 glasses of water a day with barley + hops
Carter Carter
Context ?
Jaxson Hernandez
>that there's a meaningful difference between invention and discovery
Charles Cook
>>everything is subjective As far as human experience is concerned, it is.
Nolan Hernandez
> (from Mercola --> Veeky Forums --> mainstream normans): that carbohydrates are the boogeyman, and you should drink 8 glasses of water a day except for a couple of retards, no. the vast majority on fit defend carbohydrates, and never even mentions the 8 glasses rule.
The only carbohydrates Veeky Forums hates is white bread.
James Fisher
someone trying to justify gay mirages
Grayson Brown
>we shouldn't improve our genes and make designerbabys