>Being this wrong
... how?
The Nobel Prize
David Baker
Grayson Robinson
>everything makes sense in his books
I dont know about that.
In the colorless one everything is supposed to make sense? In 1q84, where the end is abrupt and doesnt clarify anything?
take a look at this for example:
theguardian.com
what he calls 'misteries' means: I dont give a fuck about making sense.
I also read somewhere that his books are 'dreams' and that they dont need to have a meaning, they just are what they are. And in that link you can just look at his answers, its right there: misteries.
Of course
>things can also be interpented in lots of ways
,because the writer didnt give them a meaning!
we could be talking about life instead of Murakami: it doesn't make sense, I will give it a meaning myself..
Ryan Morris
Does one need to read the rest of the rat trilogy in order to read sheep chase?
Christian Carter
joseph mcelroy deserves it
Xavier Price
Knausgaard will get it.
Ending, finally, irony. Once and for all
Henry Wood
If a Norwegian is going to get it, it will probably be Jon Fosse or Kjell Askildsen. Knausgård is too young, too popular and not PC enough. And he also said he'd an hero if he got it.
Austin Flores
No just stick to A Wild Sheep Chase and Dance Dance Dance. Personally I find Dance Dance Dance to be on par with the Wind-Up Bird Chronicle.
Logan Reyes
>And he also said he'd an hero if he got it.
Maybe the Nobel committee will do it for the lulz.
Ayden Davis
I want it to be Ayn Rand for obvious reasons.
Double digits confirm.
Brody Garcia
Gotta be alive to win the Nobel.