Is genetically engineering and tailoring our very own DNA the future of humankind Veeky Forums?
>faggots be calling it unnatural and dangerous
>there is no scientific evidence that eating GMO is dangerous
>there is nothing unnatural with organisms adjusting to their environment
>we've been doing it for millennia with pets and food crops
I know I'm right Veeky Forums
Yes, but only if the cucks get out of the way. You can see them already bitching about it, "THIS IS HIGHLY UNETHICAL, HOW DARE YOU", invariable it's some numale screaming this with spittle flying out his mouth.
Regardless the Chinese won't be stopped, they are the future if the US/EU decide to be cucks forever.
>faggots
Why the homophobia?
True. We'll just let natural selection rule out the weak ones who fear improvement.
>there is no scientific evidence that eating GMO is dangerous
I wonder if this anything to do with the studies on this question being funded by the companies that produce GMO foods
Nothing is as scary as gay people. One time one of them almost ate me, they trigger my PTSD.
personally, id rather not fuck with my DNA directly, ill just take easily engineered siRNAs to lower gene expression. I'm pretty happy with my genes but being able to downregulate certain stuff could be beneficial when i inevitably get lung cancer
They're only genes tho.
>TMW genes are everywhere in all food
>TMW you're made out of genes
>How is eating genes dangerous?
Are you one of those cummunists???
as someone who makes transgenic shit all the time, why don't you just look up what genes are being inserted into your food before thinking it's bad? Also by the actual definition of the term GMO, most modern crops are GMOs, unless you thought seedless watermelons are actually a thing in nature.
If you think about it an attack dog is technically a genetically engineered bioweapon