Genetics

Drano is made out of atoms

>atoms are everywhere in your food
>you're made of atoms
>how can eating atoms be dangerous?

>make revolutionary gmo technology
>have lots of outside pressure from people to prove your food is safe
>do it
>oh well you're biased
actually I guess they could just get a third party, but who
my plant bio prof said the worst they found was a miniscule possibility that some proteins could be allergenic to some people (in which case it's a them problem for being allergic)

People have been eating GMO for decades now and they are fine.

Of more concern is hormonal byproducts accumulating in the drinking water. Genetically modifying livestock so they don't require hormones would be the fix to this, but you have to get the cucks out of the way first.

Atoms are quarks

>elementary particles are everywhere in your food
>you're made out of elementary particles
>how can eating elementary particles be dangerous?

its a fair point though

Then again what is exactly in GMO that causes health issues? As long as you're not adding any genes that produce dangerous proteins

It's the duty of companies and authorities to ensure these products do not contain things like that, as is the case with any other food source of any origin.

The truth is it is very dangerous. This is because we aren't very good at it. Three people have died from gene therapy trials. Even the recent CRISPR human gene editing wasn't very good, they were only able to copy a gene the embryo already had. They failed to put outside genes in. It may be the future, but it's a bit far off.

>invariable it's some numale
It's usually christcucks

Your real concern should be modern farming which is unsustainable and will eventually and ironically turn the farmland into a desert.

This made me laugh, thanks, user.

This guy is on the money.

GMOs don't magically enrich the soil. Even if we develop plants that generate produce 5 times the mass of current crops; you can't plant it in the Sahara desert. The amount of usable carbohydrates in the soil itself is limited, no matter how apt a GMO would be at extracting it from the soil.

So, we need extensive soil-enrichment a lot more than we need crop GMOs. Which is why we should invest more in ecological studies and short-term terraforming in which microscopic GMOs can prove instrumental.

As for modifying animals and humans. Well, we've already been doing that in much cruder ways. I'm sure in a few decades we might have some reliable methods to do it with safely.

The ethics question is a bit irrelevant. Someone, somewhere, will do it.