13m if you're looking for the general relativity portion
New V-Sauce
Daniel King
Alexander Baker
the tone of the video changes at this point and I really enjoy it. This may be his/their best work.
Adam Brooks
You mean geodesics on a cone, right? I mean, you learned about cones in high school right?
Jackson Long
It was an analogy for space curvature, obviously.
>cones
Yeah, in the sixth grade, are cones essential to a high school curriculum? I wouldn't know, our math was shit.
Hunter Reyes
As a fellow "science youtuber", I'm impressed by the amount of work that goes into those videos.
The editing and for those things is so much work. I mean on one hand it's evident, but you really I really only felt it when I started doing this shit myself. For example, the scene where he bounces the light ball vs. the steel ball. You can plan this, but it may take a few hours just to get those two fucking balls, find them, hopefully online, and have them be the same size. One such thing might seem like nothing, but it adds up. Same with animations, any space, bringing your equipment here and there. It's certainly more effort than the revenue you get from youtube - that alone can't be your motivation.
I now also notice that in tv series, when the director shows a scene for 2 seconds e.g. from the birds perspective. That's a whole lot of overhead for some details.