By putting [thing] twice, you're implying it's the same thing. Different things would be [thing] and [other thing] or something along those lines.
Don't feel too bad though, I wouldn't expect someone who fell for the STEM meme to understand the finer intricacies of language.
[[[[cannot tell if total idiot or next-level irony]]]]
readi t again retard. he was right. you literally are so possessed by your own point of view that your mind warped that sentence to fit your narrative
And he worked for awhile as a technical journalist.
It's ok STEMbabbies, I'm sure you're making lots of money. Grasping the basic fundamentals of the human language would probably only get in the way of your pursuits.
>By putting [thing] twice, you're implying it's the same thing.
Yes, I am. Maybe you try thinking before you embarrass yourself user.
As an engineer working in semi-conductors I've come to find that my fellow engineers and the programmers that work with us are completely devoid of imagination. Their sole purpose is to be a shitty computer. They learn things and then sit around until they're told how to do it and when. God forbid a process isn't 100% complete because production is officially over until me or the director provide instructions on how to proceed.
I always thought I was an unimaginative piece of shit, but I always assumed it was just from years of drinking and staying up late. These people take it to another level while being devoid of personality. If they'd had any creativity while growing up they would not have chosen to be engineers. /rant
I've met some people like this too. I can't tell sometimes whether they are actually low creativity, or if they are just too chicken-shit (or too lazy?) to try anything slightly risky or outside their experience. Not sure which is more frustrating.
"Literary" is itself a genre
you're stating the exact same variable are different numbers, or in this case studies.