So, brainlets?

It's obviously D.

Even after reading the explanation: you still don't get it?
Brainlets...

How do you all know that we're adding squares rather than the matrix revealing/hiding them as it moves left to right?

Nothing in the matrix suggests that we're looking at 3 dimensional dice. The surfaces are therefore to be considered 2D.

This means that if there were 3 red squares from the beginning, in every frame we should see 3 red squares, just arranged differently, as if they were a red snake "coiled" around the surface.

Instead, we see one two three, one two three, then two three and...? Four. This also keeps the consistency whether you count left to right or top to bottom:

>one two three
>one two three
>two three four

You need to add a red square at every frame. So the answer is D.

I never said that the matrix should be viewed as a dice or in 3D. Arranging the squares "differently" doesn't follow from any deliberate structure or reasoning.

A

You're a moron. Other than a numerical coincidence, it doesn't fit the pattern at all, since the resulting cross is inconsistent with the way squares were "added" before. It's clearly a horizontal shift of 3 squares across the block.

(What's with the progressive matrices threads lately? By the way, you faggots do know that your score is invalidated if you're taught the rule that forms the pattern, right?)

It's not a cross, it's a red snake coiled around the surface.
>brainlets can't even understand something so obvious

>another brainlet joins the fray

>he doesn't see the red snek
Sometimes I feel sorry for you brainlets. I wonder how the world must appear to someone with sub 170 IQ. (Sub 110, in your case.)

it's C you retards