no you fucking retard he's looking at (0/0)*1 = (0*1/0) = 0/0 as you literally quoted
brainlets OUT
If X/X = 1, why the FUCK isn't 0/0 1?????
Ayden Miller
Nathaniel Anderson
>he doesn't understand transitivity
i pray for you, user...
Ryan Barnes
cry more faggot, you didn't understand a simple operation
Nathan Baker
>simple operation
>ignores an axiom while invoking an axiom for said "operation"
l o l
Grayson Kelly
l m a o
Jeremiah Russell
Let me try again for the brainlet in the thread. Maybe another point of view will be of help.
Let x be any number. Then 0*x = 0 be definition of the zero element of a set. If division by zero is defined, then x = (0/0). In particular, if (0/0) is defined to be y, then there exists another number that is different from y such that this number equals y. This is a clear contradiction.
Adam Bailey
>be definition
by definition, little typo
Owen Perry
that's assuming "any" number has to be reflexive, brainlet.
Tyler Wood
>you are wrong bcuz you assume that every number must be equal to itself
>brnltwojack.jpg
Actually I laughed out loud, I get that this is a joke but I wanted to push the autism
Easton Baker
>X/X
It's X * X^-1. The inverse of X.
0 has no inverse.