This sounds as though you're complaining about personalities more than actual players. You don't have to be good at a sport to make money or have sponsors. Tiger Woods is often cited as the best golfer of all time but he's consistently performed poorly after his prime but remains popular or infamous because of his scandals and past experience. People would gladly sponsor him regardless of his actual performance because they know it will help their brand. Money in a sport isn't always based only on skill, even if it should be.
The Brainlet Effect
>Everyone else is acting like a retard. Why can't I :(
Retards like you are the reason for the rest of the board lately.
Assuming I'm also the retard that made this thread is poor judgement on your part.
I didn't say you made the thread, retard. Perpetuating it is part of the problem. Jesus you children are actual down syndrome tier.
But it's true. Science and maths and all that shit is for 130iq brainlet tryhards. True men of intellect know that this universe is just someone else's starcraft.
If someone consistently beats you and wins a lot, it's because they are better. Deal with it.
If you can't adapt your setpieces to novel strategy, it is your fault for being inferior and you suck. Sorry to break the news.
>esport
That isnt true at all you retard, you and I could play 100 games of chess and you could beat me 99 times. If I then win 70% of my games against the totality of the chess community excluding you, and you only win 30% I am a better player than you.
>sport