Not that user but he believed that mathematics without real world experiments that can confirm the equations, is useless. He wasnt a fan of quantum mechanics(neither was Einstein) because it starts diving into depths where one can only speak of probability. Einstein’s famous quote “God does not play dice” was in reference to that fact that he believed a proper quantum theory with accurate measurement would predict an exact outcome of any given quantum experiment. Instead we get waves of probability. Tesla saw this as just mathematical errors leading to incorrect assumptions about how reality works, Einstein believed that we just werent getting precise enough measurements and experiments to get the exact answer. Either way, it seems like the smartest people of the last century werent buying the Copenhagen interpretation. Then you have things liek Bohmian mechanics that were completely overlooked because people were too afraid to abandon what they had learned about the quantum world. Most people against Bohmian mechanics today do not understand it, and think that simply because most quantum physicists don’t believe in it neither should they. The truth about Bohmian mechanics(because i know im going to get flak for this) is as follows:
>it makes ALL of the same predictions as other QM interpretations, including entanglement issues, with the one exception being particle spin
>the differences in spin predictions are accounted for as a lack of understanding in what spin really is, and lack of perfect accuracy in our devices used to measure it.
>Bells theorem does not disprove Bohmian mechanics, and John Bell himself was a supporter of the theory
>Bells theorem disproves LOCAL hidden variables, not NON-LOCAL hidden variables as proposed by Bohmian mechanics.
Note that im not saying other interpretations are wrong, im just illustrating a point that scientific dogma often disqualifies good ideas and its possible we have been going down a dead end road.
Post Redpilled Geniuses & what made them redpilled
interesting post, thx.
>scientific dogma often disqualifies good ideas
Absolutely. And it is worse: science is becoming more and more political.
Holy shit, thanks anons.
I read those and was extremely surprised by it. The conclusions he reached were quite logical, and the paths there right down to mass employments and the society's likely transformation into a service industry were highly accurrate. The thing is, this idea that people would be given more mundane service jobs to keep them busy as machines were doing the real work, is something that's only been brought up as a possible solution to the AI and robotics generated mass unemployments over the past few years.
And then you realize this guy made this manifesto almost 25 years ago. I'd also never known before that Unabomber was highly intelligent, even if he was schizophrenic and a hermit. Regardless, the accuracy of his statements over such a span of time, statements which must've been birthed a decade or two prior before he started his whole bombing run, is staggering.
I can't come up with much to counter the logic either. But on the other hand, I don't agree that it's a bad thing. Look at our history, look at what we've done to the planet. Look at where we are fucking now, fighting over genders and races like fucking children.
I don't think there's anywhere else to go but forward. And if forward means the eventual annihilation of the human race, then that may very well be a good thing that was a long time coming.
>Redpilled Geniuses
Contradiction.
>Ran the Royal Mint and had forgers executed.
sauce? I'd like to read more about that but cant find shit
This is a joke, right? I see 8 colors
This is such a bullshit lie of an image. The individual colors arent even lined up properly, so you can blatantly see the transitions. They used 8 fucking colors, if you see more you are hallucinating.
it's a meme you dips
I remember when memes were good. That time has clearly come to an end.
Fake