Theoretical limit of evolution

This is impossible. We live in a dynamic forever changing world. Nothing is static and determinism is observed with stochastic backing.

Wts the point in hypotheticals when youve just made something up without any reasonable physical considerations.

evolutionary advantage is relative to the living/survival conditions. therefore, as long as a creature's existence is challenged in some way, whether by other creatures or by environment itself, there is no theoretical limit of evolution.

>What would be the theoretically deadliest most succesful creature that if it were to exist it would completely dominate all other life on earth forever?
The Chad

no the idea is to keep it within the realms of physics

but user we are the grey goo

10/10 post. Good thing you decided to necro this thread for the sake of shitty reply that has nothing to do with the OP. Next time, just sage. You get your satisfaction of posting your comment, but we don't have to deal with this shitty thread talking about hybrid virus bugs with wings.

viscous forces outweigh inertial forces, so the priniciples of aerodynamics do sort of stop mattering. Propellers no longer work. At scales this small, air molecules STICKING to our device start to become an issue. Because viscous forces are so much more relevant as we go smaller, small insects can't fly fast enough to overcome very low wind forces.