Debate: Prokaryotes vs Eukaryotes

I'm not prokaryote, never presented myself as one.

prokaryotes because they're more successful

How are they more successful, please elaborate.

Sorry I can't quite understand what you're saying, is there some sort of stain you could apply?

They've radiated to fill (far) more niches. They can survive most anything. There's a greater diversity or prokaryotes.

I meant i never presented myself as pro-prokaryote or even a prokaryote, like jeez don't stupid strawman and ad hominems when clearly you're not even clever with them

>Can't even into organelles
>Thinks literally anything outside of archaea is less clever than him
Wave that flagella all you want, you're not fooling anyone

not him but one could easily argue that eukaryotes are more successful because they have learned to adjust their environments to suit their needs. There is not a single place on earth that humans couldnt really colonize that bacteria can. Even deep sea thermal vents and shit, if we wanted to we could absolutely design a way to live there.

it's not that i dont agree with you, just that defining "best" is hard when it comes to organisms.

flagellum*

cyanobacteria have changed the Earth more than human can with present technology and they pretty much made eukaryotic life possible
>oxygen