Are you ready for fusion power?

My point: Velocity of propagation is dependent on the density of its medium. Doesn't matter if you create a wave traveling 1 mile per hour or 1000 mph, any waves you create will be constant due to the medium.

Again, that's wrong because the observer's movement relative to the aether will affect the observed speed of light. Without that observation there is no evidence for aether.

Further your entire argument is flawed since it rests on the claim that all waves require a medium, when light is not a wave. It has wavelike behavior in some contexts and particle behavior in others.

I'll break it down for you. Let's say you are traveling 1 mph in a car. The speed of light will not be c+1mph. It will be c. Now, let's say you are going 1000mph. Still, speed of light remains constant and NOT 1000mph + c.

Measurement is done from point of origination.

You can't push a wave to travel faster if the medium is resisting it. You should go to a beach some day and watch how different vehicles create waves and how they propagate.

I am obviously discussing speed of light from the headlights.

>I don't like it so it's not real.

Light has a specific range of wavelengths. It is a wave. Wave/particle duality is quantum quackery. Refer to Tesla's work for details.

Now try putting a loudspeaker in front of a car and see if the same thing happens with sound. Hint: it won't.

The medium only determines the speed of a wave *relative to the medium*. If the observer is moving relative to the medium then the observed speed changes. You are just repeating my argument without the relevant points, specifically that only light behaves that way while waves do not. This means light has no medium.

>Light has a specific warlike propertirs. >Therefore it is a wave.
No, it has non-wavelike properties, therefore it is not a wave.

What makes you think we are not a part of the medium tho lmao

>yfw energy, fequency and intensity lead you to multiverse.