Do this.
Your IQ
Chase Rogers
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jonathan James
One thing I dislike about IQ problems, is when it gets difficult enough a person can find any number of patterns to generate the shapes
For instance, flip the shape upside down and move any horizontal bar to the opposite side. You'll get another one of those shapes. However because they come in pairs, it doesn't help with the missing shape. Therefore there must be some pattern between more than 2 shapes at once.
Cameron Carter
2
William Reyes
Here's another pattern: take the bottom one and overlap the one above it.
1) two lines overlap that are connected to the center
keep them
2) two lines overlap which are not connected to the center
Remove them
3) move the horizontal line to the opposite side
You literally cannot argue I'm wrong, because this generates the top shape from the bottom two shapes. Based on this reasoning the answer should be 2 and you cannot argue I'm wrong, even if I am wrong, because one pattern is as justified as the next.
Samuel Cox
Explain your reasoning nigger.
Luis Cruz
Work from top to bottom. The top two of a column yield the bottom.
Perform an AND on the central "spokes" and perform an XOR on the perimeter.
The answer is 2.
Jason Price
I just noticed that you can also work from left to right by performing an XOR on the spokes and an AND on the perimeter also giving 2.
Aaron Bell
me got by noticing that 2 incorporated all the elements of the corresponding row/collumn
Aaron Thomas
this
Eli Morgan
I don't know if this is logically valid, but if you combine the first shape in the first row with the second shape in the second row, and the second shape in the first row with the first shape in the second row, and of course the first shape in the third row with the second shape in the third row, you all get well fit together shapes like puzzle pieces. Do that with the last shapes in the first and second row and you'll either get 1 or 2 depending on the rules.